Drop the std::list hack to allocate memory indefinitely.
Instead use a custom allocator that keeps references valid until
destruction. This allocates fixed chunks of memory and puts pointers in
a free list. When an allocation is no longer used put it back to the
free list, this doesn't heap allocate because std::vector doesn't change
the capacity. If the free list is empty, allocate a new chunk.
Most overlaps in the buffer cache only contain one mapped address.
We can avoid close to all heap allocations once the buffer cache is
warmed up by using a small_vector with a stack size of one.
Instead of using boost::icl::interval_map for caching, use
boost::intrusive::set. interval_map is intended as a container where the
keys can overlap with one another; we don't need this for caching
buffers and a std::set-like data structure that allows us to search with
lower_bound is enough.
This has been wrong since bd66646f8b
I haven't found a game that called this function (and I haven't tried this on a real Switch), and because of this I haven't been able to check if the number in assert OR the string in the assert is wrong, but one of the two is wrong:
NetworkProfileData is 0x18E, while SfNetworkProfileData is 0x17C, according to Switchbrew
Switchbrew doesn't officially say that NetworkProfileData's size is 0x18E but it's possible to calculate its size since Switchbrew provides the size and the offset of all the components of NetworkProfileData (which isn't currently implemented in yuzu, alongside SfNetworkProfileData)
NetworkProfileData documentation: https://switchbrew.org/wiki/Network_Interface_services#NetworkProfileData
SfNetworkProfileData documentation: https://switchbrew.org/wiki/Network_Interface_services#SfNetworkProfileData
Since I trust ogniK's work on reversing NIFM, I'd assume this was just a typo in the string
Previously we never cleared the states of the entries and the key would stay held down, also looping over the key bytes for each key lead to setting every bit for the key state instead of the key we wanted
"Not equal" operators on GLSL seem to behave as unordered when we expect
an ordered comparison.
Manually emulate this checking for LGE values (numbers, not-NaNs).
